πππ π£ππππ₯ π¨πππ ππ£π πππππ₯πππ π π£πππππ₯πππ€π€ πππ₯π₯ππ π₯π π£ππ¨π£ππ₯π ββ€'π€ βππππ» π€π¦ππππ€π€
πππ π£ππππ₯ π¨πππ ππ£π πππππ₯πππ π π£πππππ₯πππ€π€ πππ₯π₯ππ π₯π π£ππ¨π£ππ₯π ββ€'π€ βππππ» π€π¦ππππ€π€ βππππ₯ π¨πππ ππ£π¦ππ₯-πππππ€ πππ§π ππππ£π£πͺπ‘πππππ ππ€π‘πππ₯π€ π π ππ π¦π£π₯ π£π¦πππππ€ π π π₯ππ βπ π§ππ π£ππ€π‘π ππ€π – π¨ππππ π€ππ§ππ π₯ππ π¦π€ππππ€ π π πππ§ππ€ – π₯π π¨π£π ππππͺ π‘ππππ₯ ππ₯ ππ€ πππππππ. I n a judgment delivered this week, New Zealand’s high court found that elements of the country’s Managed Isolation and Quarantine (MIQ) system, the cornerstone of our world-leading pandemic response, were unlawful. The decision dropped to a good deal of delight. One well-known conservative commentator wrote : “So the courts have found the lockdown was illegal, the vaccine mandate was illegal and MIQ was illegal, so can anyone name a major aspect of the response that hasn’t been found to be illegal?” That response is predictably mischievous – none of those mea...