π•Šπ•šπ•£ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ π•Žπ•’π•π•π•’π•”π•– π•”π• π•Ÿπ•§π•šπ•”π•₯𝕖𝕕 𝕠𝕗 π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•–π•”π•–π•Ÿπ•₯ 𝕒𝕀𝕀𝕒𝕦𝕝π•₯

π•Šπ•šπ•£ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ π•Žπ•’π•π•π•’π•”π•– π•”π• π•Ÿπ•§π•šπ•”π•₯𝕖𝕕 𝕠𝕗 π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•–π•”π•–π•Ÿπ•₯ 𝕒𝕀𝕀𝕒𝕦𝕝π•₯

π•†π•Ÿπ•– 𝕠𝕗 ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ••'𝕀 𝕓𝕖𝕀π•₯-π•œπ•Ÿπ• π•¨π•Ÿ 𝕒𝕣π•₯ 𝕔𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕖𝕔π•₯𝕠𝕣𝕀, π•“π•¦π•€π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€π•€π•žπ•–π•Ÿ, π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•‘π•™π•šπ•π•’π•Ÿπ•₯π•™π•£π• π•‘π•šπ•€π•₯𝕀, π•Šπ•šπ•£ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ π•Žπ•’π•π•π•’π•”π•–, 𝕙𝕒𝕀 π•“π•–π•–π•Ÿ π•Ÿπ•’π•žπ•–π•• 𝕒𝕀 π•₯𝕙𝕖 "π•‘π•£π• π•žπ•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯ π•“π•¦π•€π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€π•€π•žπ•’π•Ÿ" π•›π•’π•šπ•π•–π•• 𝕗𝕠𝕣 π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•–π•”π•–π•Ÿπ•₯𝕝π•ͺ 𝕒𝕀𝕀𝕒𝕦𝕝π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•₯𝕙𝕣𝕖𝕖 π•ͺπ• π•¦π•Ÿπ•˜ π•žπ•–π•Ÿ.


π•Šπ•šπ•£ π•π•’π•žπ•–π•€ π•Žπ•’π•π•π•’π•”π•– π•”π• π•Ÿπ•§π•šπ•”π•₯𝕖𝕕 𝕠𝕗 π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•–π•”π•–π•Ÿπ•₯ 𝕒𝕀𝕀𝕒𝕦𝕝π•₯
W

allace had been granted name suppression while his case ran through the courts, but that lapsed yesterday with a final judgment by the Supreme Court.

Arts commentator and journalist Mark Amery spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.

.


.

𝔸𝕣π•₯𝕀 π•”π• π•žπ•žπ•¦π•Ÿπ•šπ•₯π•ͺ π•£π•–π•π•šπ•–π•§π•–π•• 𝕒𝕗π•₯𝕖𝕣 π•Ÿπ•’π•žπ•šπ•Ÿπ•˜

The arts community is relieved Sir James Wallace has been publicly named for indecently assaulting three young men.

The millionaire patron of the arts is said to have used his power and influence to pressure hundreds in the community for their support to keep him out of jail.

Emma Stanford reports.


π•π•šπ•”π•₯π•šπ•žπ•€ 𝕒𝕕𝕧𝕠𝕔𝕒π•₯𝕖 π• π•Ÿ π•Žπ•’π•π•π•’π•”π•– 𝕔𝕒𝕀𝕖

Name suppression for the "prominent businessman" jailed for indecently assaulting three young men lapsed yesterday.

The case against Wallace revolved around three men who told police they were assaulted at his four-storey mansion in Epsom after seeking career opportunities or business grants.

Two men said they were assaulted after going to his home for business meetings where they were given alcohol while a third was working at the house as part of a residency.

Victims advocate Ruth Money spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.

.



.

β„•π•’π•žπ•– π•€π•¦π•‘π•‘π•£π•–π•€π•€π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝕝𝕒𝕑𝕀𝕖𝕕 𝕗𝕠𝕣 'π•‘π•£π• π•žπ•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯ π•“π•¦π•€π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€π•€π•žπ•’π•Ÿ'

Art collector, businessman, and philanthropist, Wallace has been named as the "prominent businessman" jailed for indecently assaulting three young men.

His name suppression lapsed yesterday with a final judgment by the Supreme Court.

Hamish Keith is a veteran art commentator, curator and columnist who's had many dealings with Wallace over the years.

Hamish Keith spoke to Ingrid Hipkiss.


π•ƒπ•–π•˜π•’π• 𝕖𝕩𝕑𝕖𝕣π•₯ π• π•Ÿ π•π•–π•Ÿπ•˜π•₯𝕙π•ͺ π•Ÿπ•’π•žπ•– π•€π•¦π•‘π•‘π•£π•–π•€π•€π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝕕𝕖𝕝𝕒π•ͺ𝕀

Name suppression lapsed yesterday for millionaire and arts patron Sir James Wallace, who for five years was known only as a "prominent businessman" who had indecently assaulted three young men between the early 2000s and 2016.

Mr Wallace emailed hundreds of people while under name suppression, asking for support towards not going to jail.

Public law expert Graeme Edgeler spoke to Perlina Lau.

.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ••'𝕀 𝕙𝕒𝕀 𝕒 π•‘π•™π•–π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•’π• π•šπ•Ÿπ•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• 𝕣𝕖𝕑𝕦π•₯𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ, π•₯π•™π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•₯𝕠 π•π•’π•”π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•’ π”Έπ•£π••π•–π•£π•Ÿ

For Black CEOs in Silicon Valley, humiliation is a part of doing business

Fact Check: Trump lied 46 times at recent rallies