π»πππππ£π πππππ€ πππππβπ€ πΎπ£πππππππ πππ€ππ₯ ππ€ βπ»ππ€π£ππ€π‘πππ₯ππ¦πβ πΈπππ π.π. βπ£ππ€π€π¦π£π
π»πππππ£π πππππ€ πππππβπ€ πΎπ£πππππππ πππ€ππ₯ ππ€ βπ»ππ€π£ππ€π‘πππ₯ππ¦πβ πΈπππ π.π. βπ£ππ€π€π¦π£π
π»ππππ€π βπ πππ₯π₯π π½π£ππππ£πππ€ππ ππππππ ππ» πππππβπ€ πΎπ£πππππππ π§ππ€ππ₯ βπππ€π£ππ€π‘πππ₯ππ¦π,β ππ£ππ₯ππππ«πππ π.π. π‘π£ππ€π€π¦π£π π π π₯ππ π»ππππ€π π₯ππ£π£ππ₯π π£πͺ ππππ π₯πππ€ππ ππ€ π π§ππ£ π€π π§ππ£πππππ₯πͺ πππ πΈπ£ππ₯ππ π€π₯π£ππ₯πππͺ.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen sharply criticized U.S. Vice President JD Vanceβs visit to Greenland, calling it βdisrespectfulβ and a breach of diplomatic norms.
Vanceβs trip to the U.S.-operated Pituffik Space Base on March 28, 2025, has ignited tensions between Denmark and the United States, NATO allies with a historically strong partnership.
Frederiksenβs remarks highlight Denmarkβs frustration with what it perceives as American overreach into Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory, amid renewed U.S. interest in asserting control over the strategically important Arctic island.
.
RELATED:.
Vance, accompanied by his wife, Usha, and senior officials like National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, used the visit to critique Denmarkβs stewardship of Greenland.
In a speech at Pituffik, he claimed Denmark had βunderinvestedβ in the territoryβs security and its people, suggesting the U.S. could do better.
His comments align with President Donald Trumpβs persistent view that Greenland is vital to U.S. national security, a stance Trump reiterated by calling it βimportant for world peace.β
However, Vanceβs blunt rhetoric and the uninvited nature of his visit drew a fierce response from Danish and Greenlandic leaders.
Frederiksen argued that Vanceβs actions disregarded Greenlandβs autonomy and Denmarkβs sovereignty, announcing her own visit to the territory from April 2β4, 2025, to meet Greenlandβs new coalition government under Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen.
She emphasized that the U.S. should have coordinated with Danish and Greenlandic authorities, accusing Vance of undermining alliance protocols.
Greenland. file: π π―π²π π’ ππ©ππ¦π«π’
Greenlandic leaders echoed her sentiments, with Nielsen rejecting U.S. pressure and affirming that βGreenland is not for sale.β The visitβs timingβhours after Greenlandβs new government formedβfurther fueled perceptions of American meddling.
The controversy stems from broader U.S. ambitions in the Arctic, where Greenlandβs position offers strategic leverage against Russia and China.
Denmark, however, defends its role, citing significant investments like a β¬1.9 billion security package and the 1951 Defense Agreement, which already grants the U.S. a military presence in Greenland.
Foreign Minister Lars LΓΈkke Rasmussen criticized the Trump administrationβs confrontational tone, urging dialogue over unilateral moves.
Frederiksen reinforced this, noting Denmarkβs long support for U.S. interests and rejecting Vanceβs portrayal of Danish neglect.
.
.
The incident has strained U.S.-Danish relations, raising questions about NATO unity at a time of heightened Arctic competition.
For Greenlanders, caught between powers, it underscores their limited agency despite aspirations for independence from Denmarkβnot a handover to the U.S.
Public protests in Copenhagen and Nuuk reflect growing local unease with American intentions.
Frederiksenβs label of βdisrespectfulβ encapsulates Denmarkβs demand for respect as an equal partner, not a subordinate.
Her upcoming trip aims to reaffirm Denmarkβs commitment to Greenland, countering U.S. narratives.
As this diplomatic spat unfolds, its resolution will test whether the U.S. pursues cooperation or persists with pressure, potentially reshaping trust within a key alliance.
The Arcticβs geopolitical stakes ensure this dispute resonates far beyond Greenlandβs icy shores.
π π―π²π π’ ππ©ππ¦π«π’