π”Έπ•Ÿπ•’π•π•ͺπ•€π•šπ•€: π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘β€™π•€ π•‹π•’π•£π•šπ•—π•— π”Ύπ•’π•žπ•“π•šπ•₯: 𝔸 β„π•–π•”π•šπ•‘π•– 𝕗𝕠𝕣 π”Όπ•”π• π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•šπ•” β„π•¦π•šπ•Ÿ

π”Έπ•Ÿπ•’π•π•ͺπ•€π•šπ•€: π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘β€™π•€ π•‹π•’π•£π•šπ•—π•— π”Ύπ•’π•žπ•“π•šπ•₯: 𝔸 β„π•–π•”π•šπ•‘π•– 𝕗𝕠𝕣 π”Όπ•”π• π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•šπ•” β„π•¦π•šπ•Ÿ

π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘β€™π•€ π•₯π•’π•£π•šπ•—π•— π•™π•šπ•œπ•–π•€ 𝕔𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 π•¨π•£π•–π•”π•œ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•Œ.π•Š. π•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•ͺ 𝕓π•ͺ π•£π•’π•šπ•€π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•‘π•£π•šπ•”π•–π•€, 𝕙𝕦𝕣π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•”π• π•Ÿπ•€π•¦π•žπ•–π•£π•€ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•žπ•’π•Ÿπ•¦π•—π•’π•”π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕖𝕣𝕀, π•€π•‘π•’π•£π•œπ•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•šπ•Ÿπ•—π•π•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•₯𝕣𝕒𝕕𝕖 𝕨𝕒𝕣𝕀, π•’π•Ÿπ•• 𝕀π•₯π•’π•π•π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•šπ•Ÿπ•§π•–π•€π•₯π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯β€”π•£π•šπ•€π•œπ•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•£π•–π•”π•–π•€π•€π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝕒𝕀 𝕔𝕠𝕀π•₯𝕀 𝕀𝕠𝕒𝕣, 𝕖𝕩𝕑𝕠𝕣π•₯𝕀 𝕕𝕣𝕠𝕑, π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•˜π•π• π•“π•’π• 𝕣𝕖π•₯π•’π•π•šπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ π•™π•šπ•₯𝕀 𝕙𝕒𝕣𝕕.

T

rump’s tariff strategy, including a 10% baseline tariff on all imports and higher rates like 25% on Canada and Mexico, 20% on China, and even steeper targeted duties, fundamentally disrupts the U.S. economy’s reliance on global trade. 

The U.S. imports over $3 trillion in goods annually, with nearly half coming from Canada, Mexico, and China alone. 

These tariffs would sharply increase the cost of imported goodsβ€”everything from raw materials like steel and lumber to consumer products like electronics and clothing.

.

RELATED:

.

Since U.S. consumer spending drives about two-thirds of GDP, higher prices could choke demand, triggering a severe economic contraction. 

Economists estimate these tariffs could cost households over $2,100 annually on average, with some projections as high as $5,200. 

For lower- and middle-income families, who spend a larger share of their income on goods, this regressive hit would slash disposable income, cratering retail sales and rippling through service industries. 

Manufacturing, often touted as the beneficiary of Trump’s "America First" trade agenda, would also suffer. U.S. producers rely heavily on imported componentsβ€”think auto parts crossing North American borders multiple times before final assembly. 

A 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican goods, even with USMCA exemptions, would inflate production costs as firms scramble to retool supply chains. 

Retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, already signaled by Canada, Mexico, and China, would compound this by slashing U.S. export markets. In 2024, exports supported over 10 million U.S. jobs; losing competitiveness abroad could gut industries like agriculture and aerospace, where China’s tit-for-tat tariffs on U.S. goods have historically hit hard. 

Trump’s first-term tariffs, like the 25% on steel, failed to boost employment meaningfullyβ€”steel jobs stayed flat at around 140,000β€”while downstream industries like construction faced higher costs. 

This time, the scale is far larger, amplifying the damage. Inflation is another ticking bomb. 

Tariffs are taxes on imports, paid by U.S. importers and typically passed to consumers. 

A 10% universal tariff could raise core prices by 1%, per some estimates, with targeted hikes pushing inflation even higher. 

In a post-pandemic economy still sensitive to price shocks, this could force the Federal Reserve into aggressive rate hikes, slowing growth further. 

If foreign currencies weaken in responseβ€”as Mexico’s peso and Canada’s dollar already have since mid-2024β€”U.S. exports become pricier, deepening the trade deficit Trump aims to shrink. 

Ironically, his first-term tariffs grew the goods deficit from $480 billion in 2016 to $653 billion by 2020, showing how tariffs can backfire. 

Global trade wars could seal the economy’s fate. 

Trump’s "reciprocal" tariffs, set to hit dozens of allies and rivals alike, risk unraveling decades of trade liberalization. 

The EU, Japan, and others are poised to retaliate, targeting U.S. strengths like tech and agriculture. 

With trade accounting for just 24% of U.S. GDPβ€”far less than Canada’s 67% or Mexico’s 73%β€”Trump might see this as leverage, but it’s a gamble. 

The U.S. isn’t self-sufficient; it needs imports for energy, tech, and manufacturing inputs. 

A full-blown trade war could slash imports by $900 billion (28%) in 2025, per some models, shrinking GDP by 0.8% over a decade. 

If allies pivot to alternativesβ€”like the EU’s recent deals with MERCOSUR and Mexicoβ€”the U.S. could lose market share permanently, eroding its economic dominance. 

Business uncertainty would paralyse investment. Trump’s erratic tariff announcementsβ€”shifting from threats to exemptions overnightβ€”have already spooked markets, with stock indices sliding in early 2025.

.

Additional Reading:

.

Firms can’t plan when trade policy swings on a whim; long-term projects like factory reshoring stall. 

The promised manufacturing renaissance requires years, not months, and interim cost hikes could bankrupt smaller firms. 

Meanwhile, tariff revenueβ€”projected at $290 billion in 2025β€”won’t offset the economic carnage if growth tanks. 

Historically, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 deepened the Great Depression by crushing trade; Trump’s broader, steeper tariffs could echo that disaster, pushing the U.S. into recession or worse. 

In short, Trump’s tariff escalation could destroy the U.S. economy by strangling consumer spending, crippling manufacturers, igniting inflation, sparking global retaliation, and freezing investmentβ€”all while failing to deliver the jobs or security promised.

It’s a reckless gamble with a shaky track record, threatening a self-inflicted wound on an economy still fragile from post-2024 headwinds. 

The fallout could be a recessionβ€”or worse.

𝔅𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒

.

Popular posts from this blog

ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ••'𝕀 𝕙𝕒𝕀 𝕒 π•‘π•™π•–π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•’π• π•šπ•Ÿπ•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• 𝕣𝕖𝕑𝕦π•₯𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ, π•₯π•™π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•₯𝕠 π•π•’π•”π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•’ π”Έπ•£π••π•–π•£π•Ÿ

𝕀π•₯'𝕀 π•Œπ•Š 𝔼𝕝𝕖𝕔π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝔻𝕒π•ͺ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π”Έπ•žπ•–π•£π•šπ•”π•’ 𝕗𝕒𝕔𝕖𝕀 𝕒 𝕀π•₯π•’π•£π•œ π•”π•™π• π•šπ•”π•–

ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕀𝕙𝕦𝕓 π•Ÿπ•–π•¨π•€π•£π• π• π•ž 𝕗𝕒𝕔𝕖𝕀 𝕔𝕝𝕠𝕀𝕦𝕣𝕖 π•šπ•Ÿ π•Žπ•’π•£π•Ÿπ•–π•£ 𝔹𝕣𝕠𝕀. π”»π•šπ•€π•”π• π•§π•–π•£π•ͺ 𝕑𝕣𝕠𝕑𝕠𝕀𝕒𝕝