𝕃𝕦𝕩𝕠𝕟 𝕤𝕙𝕠𝕨𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕝𝕒𝕔𝕜 𝕠𝕗 𝕝𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕚𝕡 𝕒𝕘𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤𝕥 ℙ𝕖𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕚-𝕞𝕚𝕘𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕖.

𝕃𝕦𝕩𝕠𝕟 𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕠𝕨𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕄ℙ𝕤 '𝕥𝕠 𝕣𝕦𝕟 𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤 𝕒𝕣𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕 𝕙𝕚𝕞 𝕨𝕚𝕥𝕙 𝕒𝕟𝕥𝕚-𝕞𝕚𝕘𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥', 𝕄𝕖𝕟é𝕟𝕕𝕖𝕫 𝕄𝕒𝕣𝕔𝕙 𝕤𝕒𝕪𝕤

T

he Mexican ambassador appears to have more influence over Winston Peters than the prime minister himself, a Green MP says.

Ricardo Menéndez March says he has now been the subject of four Ministerial attacks because he is a migrant - yet Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has failed to make a stand.

.

.

His comments came after New Zealand First MPs Winston Peters and Shane Jones again attacked Menéndez March's status as a migrant, this time because he referred to the country's name as Aotearoa in a question in the House.

Peters asked the Speaker if someone who came to New Zealand in 2006 was allowed to ask a question that changed the country's name, without it going to a referendum.

Menéndez March, who was born in Mexico but is a New Zealand citizen, said Peters was being xenophobic.

He also said Luxon hasn't yet responded to a letter the Greens wrote to him, when Shane Jones yelled 'send the Mexicans home' three weeks ago.

The MP told Morning Report the deputy PM had made a career out of scapegoating migrant communities and the latest incident was the fourth time he had been attacked over his immigration status by a government minister.

"And yet we have a prime minister who is showing absolutely no leadership and is unable to stamp it out because he's afraid to hold Winston to account."

He said Luxon needed to make it clear that such behaviour was unacceptable.

Menéndez March said the comments have hurt New Zealand's diplomacy efforts and harmed its relationship with Mexico.

By doing nothing the prime minister had been seen to have less power than the Mexican ambassador whoreceived an apology from Peters over his remarks.

Luxon was allowing his Ministers "to run rings around him with anti-migrant sentiment".

Menéndez March said when political leaders attacked migrants in Parliament and undermined their ability to participate in democracy, it had flow-on effects outside Parliament.

"It gives the green light to people who wish to attack our migrant communities - we're seeing that on public transport, we're seeing that in other places."

.

.

Peters denied to Morning Report that he had made the use of the word Aotearoa an immigration issue.

He objected to the MP changing the country's name without any mandate or consultation.

Menéndez March had applied to move to New Zealand and should not have the "temerity" to refer to it as something else.

"Have the New Zealand people ever been asked this question? No."

Peters believed there was no debate about the country's name.

In Parliament the name of the country was New Zealand and it would not change unless New Zealanders said that was what they wanted in a referendum.

"And that's what democracy's about."

.