ℙ𝕆𝕃𝕃 π”Έπ•Ÿπ•’π•π•ͺπ•€π•šπ•€: β„‚π• π•’π•π•šπ•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ β„π•–π•“π• π•¦π•Ÿπ••π•€ π•šπ•Ÿ π”Έπ•‘π•£π•šπ• 𝟚𝟘𝟚𝟝 πŸ™β„•π•–π•¨π•€ π•π•–π•£π•šπ•’π•Ÿ ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕝

ℙ𝕆𝕃𝕃 π”Έπ•Ÿπ•’π•π•ͺπ•€π•šπ•€: β„‚π• π•’π•π•šπ•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ β„π•–π•“π• π•¦π•Ÿπ••π•€ π•šπ•Ÿ π”Έπ•‘π•£π•šπ• 𝟚𝟘𝟚𝟝 πŸ™β„•π•–π•¨π•€ π•π•–π•£π•šπ•’π•Ÿ ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕝

𝕋𝕙𝕖 π”Έπ•‘π•£π•šπ• 𝟚𝟘𝟚𝟝 πŸ™β„•π•–π•¨π•€ π•π•–π•£π•šπ•’π•Ÿ 𝕑𝕠𝕝𝕝 𝕑𝕣𝕠𝕛𝕖𝕔π•₯𝕀 ℕ𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• 𝕒π•₯ πŸ›πŸž% (+𝟚), 𝕃𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕣 πŸ›πŸš% (-πŸ™), β„•β„€ π”½π•šπ•£π•€π•₯ 𝟟% (+𝟚), π•˜π•šπ•§π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•”π• π•’π•π•šπ•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝟞𝟜 𝕀𝕖𝕒π•₯𝕀 𝕧𝕀. π•₯𝕙𝕖 𝕝𝕖𝕗π•₯’𝕀 𝟝𝟠. π•ƒπ•¦π•©π• π•Ÿβ€™π•€ πŸšπŸ›% (+πŸ™) π•–π••π•˜π•–π•€ β„π•šπ•‘π•œπ•šπ•Ÿπ•€β€™ 𝟚𝟘% (+πŸ›), π•€π•šπ•˜π•Ÿπ•’π•π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ 𝕒 π•£π•šπ•˜π•™π•₯-𝕓𝕝𝕠𝕔 π•–π••π•˜π•– π•’π•žπ•šπ•• 𝕧𝕠𝕝𝕒π•₯π•šπ•π•šπ•₯π•ͺ.

N

ational’s rise to 36% (up 2% from February’s 34%) in April's 1News/Verian poll marks its first gain in a year, reversing a downward trend seen in polls like February 2025 (34%) and October 2024 (37%). 

This could signal voter approval of coalition effortsβ€”perhaps economic β€œgreen shoots” Luxon has emphasizedβ€”or fatigue with opposition critiques. 

Credit: π”…𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒

Labour, slipping to 32% (down 1% from 33%), stalls after a February surge (+4%), suggesting its recovery from the 2023 election low (28%) may be plateauing without a stronger leadership boost. 

The Greens, steady at 10%, maintain consistency despite past volatility (e.g., 14% in April 2024, 10% in December 2024), reinforcing their role as a reliable left-bloc partner. 

ACT, also steady at 9%, shows resilience after climbing from 7% in April 2024, though it’s below its election peak (10-13%), hinting at a loyal but static base. 

.

Related:

.

NZ First’s jump to 7% (up 2%)β€”its highest since 2017β€”revives its kingmaker status, echoing its 2023 resurgence (6% in October). 

Te Pāti Māori’s drop to 3% (down 1% from 4%) follows a December 2024 peak (7%), possibly reflecting a post-hΔ«koi normalisation, though electorate wins could still secure seats. 

Using these figures, the right bloc (National 36%, ACT 9%, NZ First 7%) totals 52%, translating to roughly 64 seats in a 122-seat Parliament (National ~45, ACT ~11, NZ First ~9), assuming an overhang from Te Pāti Māori’s six electorate seats. 

The left bloc (Labour 32%, Greens 10%, Te Pāti Māori 3%) totals 45%, yielding about 58 seats (Labour ~40, Greens ~12, Te Pāti Māori ~6). 

The coalition retains a governing edge, reversing February’s left-bloc lead (61 vs. 60). 

Preferred PM. Credit: 1News

Leadership Ratings 

Luxon’s preferred PM rating of 23% (up 1% from 22%) recovers slightly from his February low, though it’s far from his October 2024 peak (25%). 

This modest uptick might reflect coalition stability, but his persistent sub-25% score suggests limited personal appeal amid economic woes. 

Hipkins, at 20% (up 3% from 17%), narrows the gap, his best since February 2024 (15%), hinting at growing credibility as an opposition leader, though still below Luxon. 

Peters’ rise to 7% (up 2%) aligns with NZ First’s surge, reinforcing his enduring influence. 

Swarbrick’s fall to 4% (down 2% from 6%) and Seymour’s drop to 3% (down 3% from 6%) indicate fading momentum for minor-party leaders, while Maipi-Clarke’s 1% reflects Te Pāti Māori’s niche visibility. 

The spreadβ€”Luxon and Hipkins dominating, others trailingβ€”shows a two-horse race with coalition dynamics amplifying Peters.

Voter Trend (1News specific) . Credit: π”…𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒

Broader Context and Sentiment 

Without April-specific sentiment data, February 2025’s trends (36% economic optimism, down 5%; 25% pessimism, up 3%) likely persist, given ongoing coalition focus on fiscal restraint. 

National’s gain could tie to Luxon’s β€œturning the corner” narrative, while Labour’s stall might reflect voter skepticism about its alternative vision. 

NZ First’s leap suggests Peters’ populist appeal resonates amid economic or cultural unease, possibly tied to Treaty debates or public service cuts. 

.

Related:
𝕋𝕙𝕖 π”Ύπ• π•§π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯ π•Ÿπ•–π•–π••π•€ π•₯𝕠 π•˜π•–π•₯ 𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕝

.

Implications 

The coalition’s 64 seats offer breathing room, a shift from February’s near-tie, but NZ First’s 7% is pivotalβ€”dropping below 5% (e.g., 4% in April 2024) would leave National and ACT short at ~56 seats. 

Projected seats. Credit: 1News

Labour’s left bloc, at 58 seats, remains competitive but needs NZ First’s exclusion or a bigger swing to govern. 

The Β±3.1% margin means National (33-39%) and Labour (29-35%) overlap, keeping the race fluid. 

Critical Perspective 

The figures align with Verian’s historical patternsβ€”e.g., National’s 36% matches April 2024β€”but lack undecided voter data (12% in February) or methodology confirmation. 

Compared to February’s Curia poll (National 31.9%, Labour 31.3%), the right bloc’s edge here is more pronounced, though polling discrepancies caution against overconfidence. 

The real story: a coalition rebound, NZ First’s revival, and a restless electorate still weighing economic pain against political promises

𝔅𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒

.

Popular posts from this blog

ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ••'𝕀 𝕙𝕒𝕀 𝕒 π•‘π•™π•–π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•’π• π•šπ•Ÿπ•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• 𝕣𝕖𝕑𝕦π•₯𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ, π•₯π•™π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•₯𝕠 π•π•’π•”π•šπ•Ÿπ••π•’ π”Έπ•£π••π•–π•£π•Ÿ

𝕀π•₯'𝕀 π•Œπ•Š 𝔼𝕝𝕖𝕔π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝔻𝕒π•ͺ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π”Έπ•žπ•–π•£π•šπ•”π•’ 𝕗𝕒𝕔𝕖𝕀 𝕒 𝕀π•₯π•’π•£π•œ π•”π•™π• π•šπ•”π•–

ℕ𝕖𝕨𝕀𝕙𝕦𝕓 π•Ÿπ•–π•¨π•€π•£π• π• π•ž 𝕗𝕒𝕔𝕖𝕀 𝕔𝕝𝕠𝕀𝕦𝕣𝕖 π•šπ•Ÿ π•Žπ•’π•£π•Ÿπ•–π•£ 𝔹𝕣𝕠𝕀. π”»π•šπ•€π•”π• π•§π•–π•£π•ͺ 𝕑𝕣𝕠𝕑𝕠𝕀𝕒𝕝