ℕ𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π•’𝕀 $πŸšπŸ™π”Ή 𝕋𝕒𝕩 ℂ𝕦π•₯𝕀 𝔽𝕦𝕖𝕝 𝔻𝕖𝕓π•₯, π•Šπ•”π•£π•–π•¨ π•‚π•šπ•¨π•šπ•€

Analysis by Bruce Alpine, May 27. 2025

ℕ𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π•’𝕀 $πŸšπŸ™π”Ή 𝕋𝕒𝕩 ℂ𝕦π•₯𝕀 𝔽𝕦𝕖𝕝 𝔻𝕖𝕓π•₯, π•Šπ•”π•£π•–π•¨ π•‚π•šπ•¨π•šπ•€

𝕋𝕙𝕖 π•€π•žπ•¦π•˜ β„‚π• π•’π•π•šπ•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ 𝕠𝕗 𝕔𝕙𝕒𝕠𝕀 π•˜π• π•§π•₯ 𝕙𝕒𝕀 π•‘π•π•¦π•Ÿπ•˜π•–π•• π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿ π•šπ•Ÿπ•₯𝕠 𝕒 π•—π•šπ•€π•”π•’π• 𝕒𝕓π•ͺ𝕀𝕀, π•“π• π•£π•£π• π•¨π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•€π•‘π•–π•Ÿπ••π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•žπ• π•£π•– π•₯π•™π•’π•Ÿ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•‘π•£π•–π•§π•šπ• π•¦π•€ 𝕃𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕣 π•˜π• π•§π•₯ π•¨π•™π•šπ•π•– π•˜π•¦π•₯π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•₯𝕒𝕩 𝕓𝕒𝕀𝕖 π•¨π•šπ•₯𝕙 𝕒 π• π•“π•€π•”π•–π•Ÿπ•– $πŸšπŸ™ π•“π•šπ•π•π•šπ• π•Ÿ π•šπ•Ÿ π•₯𝕒𝕩 𝕔𝕦π•₯𝕀 𝕗𝕠𝕣 π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•£π•šπ•”π•™ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•π•’π•Ÿπ••π•π• π•£π••π•€.

N

ational’s borrowing is a financial trainwreck. Budget 2024 shovels $12 billion in new debt onto the pile, fueled by a limp economy and a fanatical obsession with $21 billion in tax cuts that have obliterated government revenue. 

Net core Crown debt has skyrocketed to 42.5% of GDP in June 2024, up from Labour’s 38.45% in 2023, with projections hitting 42.6% by March 2025. 

Finance Minister Nicola Willis crows about a 20–40% debt-to-GDP target—tighter than Labour’s 50% ceiling—but it’s a pathetic smokescreen as debt explodes under her watch. 

.

Related:

.

Reverting to the 2009 net debt definition (excluding NZ Super Fund assets) is a cynical ploy to hide the carnage. 

This borrowing binge bankrolls tax cuts, including income tax relief and landlord interest rebates, costing $21 billion over four years—a shameless giveaway to the wealthy elite. 

National’s borrowing outstrips Labour’s projections by $17 billion; official data confirms a $12 billion surge, still a grotesque betrayal of fiscal sanity. 

Labour’s borrowing, while hefty, was forged in crisis. Net core Crown debt climbed from 21.6% of GDP in 2017 to 38.45% by 2023, driven by the $50 billion COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund and a $12.1 billion initial package to save jobs and businesses during a global meltdown. 

Their 2023 Budget projected $120 billion in bonds over four years, plus $20 billion for cyclone recovery—tough but necessary calls, unlike National’s grotesque handout to the rich. Spending National’s spending is a middle finger to ordinary Kiwis, with core Crown expenditure at 33.5% of GDP in 2024–25, eclipsing Labour’s 33.0% in 2023.

Finance minister Nicola Willis attempts to explain why she is so addicted to spending. file: 𝔅𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒. courtesy TV1 Q&A 

Their paltry $3.2 billion operating allowance is a cruel facade, masking a $21 billion tax cut bonanza for landlords and high earners, alongside spending on transport, infrastructure, and Cyclone Gabrielle recovery. 

These cuts have gutted the tax base, forcing heartless slashes to school lunch programs and public transport subsidies, leaving kids and commuters to rot. 

Finance costs for 2023–24 hit $8.8 billion, more than defense, police, corrections, and customs combined—a damning monument to National’s debt-fueled idiocy. 

Labour’s $139 billion in 2023–24 spending, up $11.4 billion, poured into health (scrapping $5 prescription fees), free early childhood education, and public transport subsidies, tackling cost-of-living pain and rebuilding post-COVID. 

It was big but grounded in reality, not National’s fantasy of trickle-down economics. 

.

Related:

.

Conclusion 

National’s borrowing (42.5% of GDP vs. Labour’s 38.45%) and spending (33.5% vs. 33.0%) dwarf Labour’s, despite their sanctimonious fiscal prudence charade. 

By torching $21 billion of the tax base on tax cuts for the rich, National has ignited a debt crisis, screwed over vulnerable Kiwis, and sold out the nation’s future for a handful of wealthy mates. Shame on them.

π€π§πšπ₯𝐲𝐬𝐒𝐬: π”…𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒

.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ•• β„π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•Šπ•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ•• 𝔽𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕀π•₯, 𝕆𝕦π•₯π•€π•™π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€ 𝕄𝕠𝕀π•₯ π•Žπ•–π•€π•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿ π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•”π•šπ•–π•€

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕒π•₯𝕙 𝕠𝕗 𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸: π”Έπ•Ÿ π•šπ••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•”π•’π• ℂ𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕑𝕀𝕖

π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘'𝕀 "π”Όπ•©π•”π•–π•π•π•–π•Ÿπ•₯ ℍ𝕖𝕒𝕝π•₯𝕙" β„‚π•π•’π•šπ•ž π•Œπ•Ÿπ••π•–π•£π•žπ•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•• 𝕓π•ͺ π•„π•–π••π•šπ•”π•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•€ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π”»π•–π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯π•šπ•’ β„‚π• π•Ÿπ•”π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•€