Trickle-Down Shattered Single-Income Dreams: Tax Rich Now to Destroy Inequalities.

𝘐𝘯 𝘖𝘌𝘊𝘋 𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘵𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘬𝘭𝘦-𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘱 𝘧𝘢𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘶𝘭𝘵𝘪-𝘫𝘰𝘣 𝘱𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘺 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘵𝘸𝘰 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴—𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦𝘥. 𝘛𝘢𝘹𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘪𝘴𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘲𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴.

𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 By Bruce Alpine .

I

n the gleaming narrative of the 2025 modern world—boasting AI-driven efficiencies and OECD GDP growth averaging 2.8%—a grim political choice unfolds even in so-called civilized nations: tax the ultra-rich progressively or let them squeeze the working poor into destitution, where families juggle two or three jobs yet teeter on poverty's edge due to government-set minimum wages that haven't kept pace with skyrocketing living costs.

This isn't market inevitability; it's policy inertia, with elites capturing 41% of new global wealth since 2000 while the bottom 50% scrapes by with 1%, per Oxfam.

In OECD bastions like the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and EU countries, in-work poverty afflicts 8.2% of employed adults—over 17 million souls—despite full-time (or more) toil, as Eurostat's 2025 data reveals. 

Minimum wages, frozen or minimally adjusted amid 5-7% inflation spikes, render a single earner inadequate for families, forcing polyworking that erodes health and family time.

Before 'Trickle Down' policies were imposed in the 1980s, a family could be supported on a single income in many OECD nations, with median wages covering housing, food, and basics amid lower inequality (top 10% incomes just 7 times the bottom); now, two or three incomes are hard-pressed to make ends meet as wage growth lagged productivity by 20-30% post-reforms.

The squeeze thrives on trickle-down relics: Corporate tax loopholes and flat-rate favoritism starve public coffers, leaving minimums—like the UK's £11.44/hour, Australia's $24.10, New Zealand's $23.50 (from April 2025), or Canada's varying provincials—lagging 20-30% behind living wage benchmarks, per ILO analyses.

Employers are relying on these minimum wage levels to keep the poor, poor and the rich to increase their wealth, suppressing labour costs to inflate profits—corporate margins hit record highs in 2024—while executive pay soars 300% since 1990, funneling gains to shareholders amid stagnant bottom-end wages that barely outpace inflation. 

RELATED:

Labour's CGT: A Global Lesson In Fairness For Aotearoa's Future.

Govt's Fiscal Failures Leave Vulnerable Kiwis Struggling. Eyeing the 2026 Election.

In New Zealand, the minimum trails the $28.95 living wage by 19%, pushing 7% of workers (200,000 people as of June 2025) into multiple jobs, with reports showing one-third having taken extra roles amid casualization and cost-of-living crises. 

In Australia, 34% of workers moonlight, the global high, while Canada's 2025 National Advisory Council report laments a "safety net with holes," where 1 in 10 working households—often dual-earners plus side gigs—fall below the $25,000 low-income threshold, as childcare and rents balloon. 

Across the EU, Luxembourg's 13.4% in-work poverty rate underscores the irony: High GDP, yet low-wage sectors (retail, hospitality) push 9% of men and 7.3% of women into risk despite multiple shifts.

Germany's 6.5% working poor rate, per Destatis, hits part-timers hardest, with temporary contracts amplifying the trap. 

This polywork epidemic—up 15% since 2020 in these nations—fuels burnout, with JRF's UK Poverty 2025 guide noting 4.5 million in-work poor, many on zero-hour deals, where even three jobs yield after-tax scraps below 60% of median income.

Choosing the squeeze perpetuates fragility: IMF models peg such inequality at a 0.5-1% annual GDP drag, as exhausted workers fuel low productivity and social unrest, from Australian youth protests to EU gig strikes and New Zealand's rising homelessness. 

Yet the pivot is straightforward—taxing the rich more is imperative for the destruction of inequalities, dismantling the hoarded gains that prop up this polywork nightmare and redirecting them to equitable foundations. 

Opponents often invoke the 'capital flight' myth—claiming the rich will flee with their wealth—but there's no evidence for it; decades of data show minimal migration impacts, with high-tax jurisdictions like Sweden and France retaining talent while revenues and growth hold steady. 

Progressive taxation, like 2% billionaire levies or 50% top brackets, unlocks 2-4% of GDP for wage floors and transfers. 

Brazil's reforms lifted 15 million via funded grants; scaling this in OECD realms could slash in-work poverty 20%, per Brookings, yielding 10:1 mobility returns and 18 million green jobs by 2030. 

Finland's 2.8% rate proves it: Robust taxes fund living wages, minimizing multiple-job desperation. 

In 2025, with G20 dithering on equity panels, this is raw politics—elites lobby for cuts, but voters can demand redesign. 

Tax the rich, or watch civilised societies fracture under polywork's weight. 

Equity isn't charity; it's the engine of true modernity.

—