𝕐𝕖𝕀π•₯𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒π•ͺ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• 𝕑𝕒𝕣π•₯π•ͺ π•₯π•£π•šπ•–π•• π•₯𝕠 π•£π•–π•žπ• π•§π•– 𝕃𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕣 𝔻𝕒π•ͺ π•—π•£π• π•ž π•™π• π•π•šπ••π•’π•ͺ𝕀 𝕒𝕔π•₯.

-

𝕐𝕖𝕀π•₯𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒π•ͺ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• 𝕑𝕒𝕣π•₯π•ͺ π•₯π•£π•šπ•–π•• π•₯𝕠 π•£π•–π•žπ• π•§π•– 𝕃𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕣 𝔻𝕒π•ͺ π•—π•£π• π•ž π•™π• π•π•šπ••π•’π•ͺ𝕀 𝕒𝕔π•₯.


𝕐𝕖𝕀π•₯𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒π•ͺ, ℕ𝕒π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•’π• π•₯π•£π•šπ•–π•• π•₯𝕠 π•£π•–π•žπ• π•§π•– 𝕃𝕒𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕣 𝔻𝕒π•ͺ 𝕒𝕀 𝕒 π•‘π•¦π•“π•π•šπ•” π•™π• π•π•šπ••π•’π•ͺ. 𝕐𝕠𝕦'𝕣𝕖 π•Ÿπ• π•₯ π•£π•–π•’π••π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•₯𝕙𝕒π•₯ π•¨π•£π• π•Ÿπ•˜.


.





.



.

But Failed - Thank you Jacinda

.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ•• β„π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•Šπ•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ•• 𝔽𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕀π•₯, 𝕆𝕦π•₯π•€π•™π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€ 𝕄𝕠𝕀π•₯ π•Žπ•–π•€π•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿ π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•”π•šπ•–π•€

-
Image
ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ•• β„π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•Šπ•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ•• 𝔽𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕀π•₯, 𝕆𝕦π•₯π•€π•™π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€ 𝕄𝕠𝕀π•₯ π•Žπ•–π•€π•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿ π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•”π•šπ•–π•€ ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•£π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•€π•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ•• 𝕗𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕀π•₯ π•˜π•π• π•“π•’π•π•π•ͺ, π•€π•¦π•£π•‘π•’π•€π•€π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ β„‚π•’π•Ÿπ•’π••π•’, 𝔸𝕦𝕀π•₯π•£π•’π•π•šπ•’, π•Œπ•‚, π•Œπ•Š π•šπ•Ÿ π••π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•₯π•šπ•” π•π•šπ•“π•–π•£π•₯π•šπ•–π•€. 𝗔 otearoa New Zealand ranks second in the 2025 Freedom in the World report by Freedom House , scoring 99/100, just behind Finland’s perfect 100.  This stellar ranking reflects its robust democratic institutions, strong civil liberties, and adherence to the rule of law, positioning it ahead of most Western nations like Canada, Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom.  Let’s explore how New Zealand compares to these peers and why it excels. New Zealand’s 40/40 in political rights highlights its free, fair elections and vibrant political pluralism, with opposition parties operating freely.  Its 59/60 in civil liberties underscores strong protections for f...
Read more

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕒π•₯𝕙 𝕠𝕗 𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸: π”Έπ•Ÿ π•šπ••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•”π•’π• ℂ𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕑𝕀𝕖

-
Image
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕒π•₯𝕙 𝕠𝕗 𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸: π”Έπ•Ÿ π•šπ••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•”π•’π• ℂ𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕑𝕀𝕖 π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘’𝕀 π•”π• π•Ÿπ•§π•šπ•”π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•€, π•—π•’π•šπ•π•¦π•£π•– π•₯𝕠 “π••π•£π•’π•šπ•Ÿ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•€π•¨π•’π•žπ•‘,” π•šπ•Ÿπ•—π•šπ•˜π•™π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜, π••π•šπ•€π•šπ•π•π•¦π•€π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯, π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•–π•©π•šπ•₯ 𝕔𝕠𝕦𝕝𝕕 π•–π•Ÿπ•• 𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸’𝕀 π•Ÿπ•’π•₯π•šπ•§π•šπ•€π•ž, π•’π•Ÿπ•₯π•š-π•–π•π•šπ•₯π•šπ•€π•ž, π•’π•Ÿπ•• 𝕑𝕣𝕠π•₯𝕖𝕔π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•šπ•€π•ž, π•π•–π•’π•§π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•šπ•₯𝕀 π•šπ••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•–π•€ 𝕗𝕣𝕒𝕔π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕖𝕕 π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•—π•’π••π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•¨π•šπ•₯𝕙𝕠𝕦π•₯ 𝕒 π•¦π•Ÿπ•šπ•—π•ͺπ•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ 𝕝𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕣. 𝗧 he MAGA movement, branded by critics as a cult worshiping Donald Trump’s brash persona, is teetering on a knife’s edge. Trump’s 34 felony convictions for falsifying business records, tied to hush money payments to cover an extramarital affair, stain his “drain the swamp” promise—a pledge to purge Washington of corruption.  Coupled with failure to deliver, vicious infighting, disillusionment, and Trump’s inevitable exit, these could obliterate MAGA’s future, leaving it a fractured relic of populist fury....
Read more

ℍ𝕠𝕨 β„π•–π•‘π•¦π•“π•π•šπ•”π•’π•Ÿπ•€ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•₯𝕀 π•Šπ•¨π•’π•‘π•‘π•–π•• π•€π••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•–π•€: 𝔸 β„‚π•–π•Ÿπ•₯𝕦𝕣π•ͺ 𝕠𝕗 β„‚π•™π•’π•Ÿπ•˜π•–

-
Image
ℍ𝕠𝕨 β„π•–π•‘π•¦π•“π•π•šπ•”π•’π•Ÿπ•€ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•₯𝕀 π•Šπ•¨π•’π•‘π•‘π•–π•• π•€π••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•–π•€: 𝔸 β„‚π•–π•Ÿπ•₯𝕦𝕣π•ͺ 𝕠𝕗 β„‚π•™π•’π•Ÿπ•˜π•– π•†π•Ÿπ•– β„π•¦π•Ÿπ••π•£π•–π•• π•ͺ𝕖𝕒𝕣𝕀 π•’π•˜π•  π•₯𝕙𝕖 π”Έπ•žπ•–π•£π•šπ•”π•’ π•‘π• π•π•šπ•₯π•šπ•”π•’π• π•€π•”π•–π•Ÿπ•– 𝕨𝕒𝕀 π••π•šπ•—π•—π•–π•£π•–π•Ÿπ•₯. 𝕋𝕙𝕖 π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•₯𝕀 𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕖 π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•”π• π•Ÿπ•€π•–π•£π•§π•’π•₯π•šπ•§π•– 𝕑𝕒𝕣π•₯π•ͺ (π•€π• π•”π•šπ•’π•π•π•ͺ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ• π•žπ•šπ•”π•’π•π•π•ͺ) 𝕋𝕙𝕖 β„π•–π•‘π•¦π•“π•π•šπ•”π•’π•Ÿπ•€ 𝕨𝕖𝕣𝕖 π•₯𝕙𝕖 π•π•šπ•“π•–π•£π•’π• π• π•Ÿπ•–π•€. π•Šπ•  𝕨𝕙𝕒π•₯ π•™π•’π•‘π•‘π•–π•Ÿπ•–π••? T he ideological shift between the American Republican and Democratic parties, often called a "switch," was a gradual process spanning the 19th to 20th centuries.  Driven by economic, social, and regional changes, particularly around civil rights, the parties transformed from their original platforms to their modern identities.  This analysis outlines how this realignment occurred. So lets unpack this. . Related : π”Έπ•Ÿπ•₯π•š-π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘ 𝕑𝕣𝕠π•₯𝕖𝕀π•₯𝕀 π•šπ•Ÿ π•”π•šπ•₯π•šπ•–π•€ 𝕒𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕀𝕀 π•Œπ•Š 𝕕𝕖𝕔𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕖 ...
Read more