𝔸𝕣𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕟’𝕤 𝕄𝕖𝕞𝕠𝕚𝕣, 𝔻𝕠𝕔𝕦𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝕊𝕡𝕒𝕣𝕜 𝕄𝕚𝕤𝕠𝕘𝕪𝕟𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔 𝔹𝕒𝕔𝕜𝕝𝕒𝕤𝕙

𝕁𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕟𝕕𝕒 𝔸𝕣𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕟’𝕤 𝟚𝟘𝟚𝟝 𝕞𝕖𝕞𝕠𝕚𝕣 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕊𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕖-𝕨𝕚𝕟𝕟𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕕𝕠𝕔𝕦𝕞𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝕣𝕖𝕚𝕘𝕟𝕚𝕥𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕓𝕒𝕥𝕖. ℂ𝕣𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕤, 𝕞𝕒𝕟𝕪 𝕦𝕟𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕕 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕞𝕚𝕤𝕠𝕘𝕪𝕟𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔, 𝕤𝕝𝕒𝕞 𝕙𝕖𝕣 ℂ𝕆𝕍𝕀𝔻 𝕡𝕠𝕝𝕚𝕔𝕚𝕖𝕤 𝕒𝕟𝕕 𝕖𝕞𝕡𝕒𝕥𝕙𝕪 𝕒𝕤 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕗𝕠𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖, 𝕨𝕙𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕤𝕦𝕡𝕡𝕠𝕣𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕒𝕚𝕤𝕖 𝕙𝕖𝕣 𝕔𝕠𝕞𝕡𝕒𝕤𝕤𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝕝𝕖𝕒𝕕𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕚𝕡. ℙ𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕚𝕫𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝕡𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕤.

𝗧

he release of Jacinda Ardern’s memoir, A Different Kind of Power, and the documentary Prime Minister has reignited fierce debate over her tenure as New Zealand’s Prime Minister. 

Globally celebrated for her empathetic leadership during the Christchurch mosque attacks and COVID-19 pandemic, Ardern faces a torrent of domestic criticism, particularly in New Zealand. 

The documentary, which won the Audience Award for World Cinema Documentary at the 2025 Sundance Film Festival, has fueled both praise and scorn. 

Courtesy: Magnolia Pictures, HBO documentaries

Yet, no memoir or film can satisfy everyone, especially not a vocal cadre of critics, many of whom haven’t read the memoir or seen the documentary, and whose attacks often drip with misogynistic venom rather than reasoned critique.

 Critics slam Ardern’s memoir for allegedly sidestepping contentious issues, notably her COVID-19 policies.

New Zealand’s lockdowns and vaccine mandates, initially lauded for low mortality, sparked backlash, evident in the 2022 Wellington protests. 

Detractors howl about economic mismanagement, citing $205 billion in borrowing and $71 billion in money printing that they claim left Kiwis in financial ruin. 

An unauthorized biography, touted as the “real story” with input from 120 interviewees, including pundits like Mike Hosking, aims to dismantle her narrative. 

Its timed release and billboard blitz scream of a vendetta to paint Ardern as dodging accountability. 

Many of these critics, particularly online, haven’t engaged with the memoir or documentary, instead hurling misogynistic barbs at her appearance, motherhood, or “soft” leadership style, revealing a pathetic reliance on gendered stereotypes over policy substance. 

New Zealand media figures like Heather du Plessis-Allan snipe at Ardern for avoiding tough interviews, implying she shunned scrutiny. 

Acting Prime Minister David Seymour has taken potshots at the memoir’s depth, fueling political point-scoring. 

The Telegraph’s scathing review trashes it as sentimental drivel for “criers, worriers, and huggers,” dismissing its policy rigor. 

These critics cast Ardern’s empathy as a calculated act for global adulation, ignoring domestic struggles. 

Grok, how did Jacinda Ardern breach the New Zealand bill of rights?

Jacinda Ardern, as New Zealand's Prime Minister from 2017 to 2023, faced criticism and legal challenges related to policies implemented during her tenure, particularly around COVID-19 vaccine mandates and… pic.twitter.com/X9AYyLHaqr

— NZ MAGA Mike #MAGAMEMEmarathon (@NZMAGAMike) February 23, 2025

'critics’ gendered tirades are a weak substitute for actual debate.' 

A significant chunk of this criticism leans on misogynistic tropes, branding her emotional leadership as weakness, exposing their bias more than her record. 

Supporters, meanwhile, champion her resilience. 

The New York Times and Vanity Fair praise her for navigating crises while juggling motherhood. 

The Sundance award-winning Prime Minister, hailed by The Washington Post for its intimacy, bolsters this view. 

Oprah Winfrey has called her a beacon of compassionate leadership. 

Oprah Winfrey expresses her deep admiration for her hero: Dame Jacinda Ardern. video: 𝔅𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔢 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔢

The memoir’s success—topping New Zealand’s bestseller list for three weeks and soaring in the UK, US, and Australia—proves her enduring support. 

Fans argue she led with authenticity under brutal pressure, facing scrutiny amplified by her gender. 

The divide is starkly ideological. Ardern’s progressive image makes her a lightning rod for conservative ire, with her 2023 resignation and US Harvard fellowship spun as a cowardly exit. 

Many critics, especially those peddling misogynistic bile, haven’t engaged with her work and rely on gendered attacks instead of facts. 

No memoir or film could appease this crowd, whose prejudices drown out reason. 

Without reading the memoir or documentary, a full judgment is tough. 

The backlash mixes policy grievances with ugly, misogynistic resentment of Ardern’s global stature. 

Supporters may gloss over flaws, but the critics’ gendered tirades are a weak substitute for actual debate.

𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀: 𝔅𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔢 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔢

.