π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘ π”»π•–π•Ÿπ•šπ•–π•€ 𝔻𝕖𝕑𝕠𝕣π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ β„‚π•šπ•₯π•šπ•«π•–π•Ÿπ•€, π•π•šπ• π•π•’π•₯𝕖𝕀 𝔽𝕠𝕦𝕣π•₯π•–π•–π•Ÿπ•₯𝕙 π”Έπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ••π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯

π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘ π”»π•–π•Ÿπ•šπ•–π•€ 𝔻𝕖𝕑𝕠𝕣π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ β„‚π•šπ•₯π•šπ•«π•–π•Ÿπ•€, π•π•šπ• π•π•’π•₯𝕖𝕀 𝔽𝕠𝕦𝕣π•₯π•–π•–π•Ÿπ•₯𝕙 π”Έπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ••π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯

π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘ π”Έπ••π•žπ•šπ•Ÿ π”»π•–π•Ÿπ•šπ•–π•€ 𝔻𝕖𝕑𝕠𝕣π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ π•Œ.π•Š. β„‚π•šπ•₯π•šπ•«π•–π•Ÿ β„‚π•™π•šπ•π••π•£π•–π•Ÿ π•₯𝕠 β„π• π•Ÿπ••π•¦π•£π•’π•€, β„‚π•π•’π•šπ•žπ•€ π•π• π•π•¦π•Ÿπ•₯𝕒𝕣π•ͺ π”Έπ•”π•”π• π•žπ•‘π•’π•Ÿπ•šπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯, π•π•šπ• π•π•’π•₯π•šπ•Ÿπ•˜ 𝔽𝕠𝕦𝕣π•₯π•–π•–π•Ÿπ•₯𝕙 π”Έπ•žπ•–π•Ÿπ••π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯.

T

he Trump administration’s 2025 immigration crackdown has led to U.S. citizen children being sent to Honduras with their undocumented mothers, prompting accusations of unconstitutional deportations. 

The White House insists these children, including naturalized citizens, were not deported but accompanied their mothers, who were lawfully removed for being undocumented. 

This claim has fueled concerns about violations of the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects citizens’ rights, as U.S. law offers no automatic deportation protection for undocumented mothers of naturalized citizens. 

.

Related:

.

The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1, states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States… No State shall… deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny… equal protection of the laws.” 

This guarantees citizenship for naturalized children and prohibits their deportation, ensuring due process. 

Deporting citizens or effectively removing them by deporting their parents without process violates these protections. 

In April 2025, three U.S. citizen children—aged 2, 4, and 7, including one naturalized citizen—were sent to Honduras with their undocumented mothers. 

One child, a 4-year-old with Stage 4 cancer, was removed without medication, sparking outrage. 

Detained during routine check-ins in Louisiana, families were held incommunicado and deported within hours. 

Attorneys argue mothers were given no meaningful choice to leave children with U.S. guardians, despite their citizenship. 

The White House, via border czar Tom Homan, claims the children accompanied their mothers voluntarily.

Homan's claim contradicts U.S. laws and legal principles governing consent, particularly for minors, vary by context—such as medical treatment, contracts, criminal law, or immigration proceedings—and often presume that young children lack the capacity to provide informed consent due to their age and developmental stage. 

On CBS’s Face the Nation (April 27, 2025), Homan stated, “We don’t deport citizens.

Having a citizen child isn’t a free pass.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on NBC’s Meet the Press, echoed this, citing notes like one from the 2-year-old’s mother as evidence of intent. 

Lawyers, including the ACLU, counter that rapid deportations—often within 24 hours—coerce mothers, violating due process for both mothers and children. 

U.S. law, under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), subjects undocumented mothers to removal regardless of their children’s citizenship. 

No automatic protection exists for mothers of naturalized citizens, though adult children (21+) can petition for their green cards (INA Section 201). 

Expedited removals (INA Section 235) limit due process, exacerbating risks. 

While prosecutorial discretion may consider family ties, the Trump administration’s 2025 policies prioritize enforcement, offering little relief. 

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, a Trump appointee, expressed concern that a 2-year-old was deported “with no meaningful process,” scheduling a May 19, 2025, hearing. 

.

Related:

.

Legal experts argue that removing citizens, even indirectly, violates the Fourteenth Amendment. 

The administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to bypass non-citizen due process heightens fears of broader violations. 

Deportations to Guatemala and Costa Rica, often involving third-country nationals, underscore the operation’s scope. 

Military-assisted flights and GuantΓ‘namo Bay detentions further raise oversight concerns. 

As legal challenges mount, ensuring compliance with constitutional protections for naturalized and born citizens remains critical to prevent unlawful removals of U.S. citizen children.

𝗒𝗽𝗢𝗻𝗢𝗼𝗻: 𝔅𝔯𝔲𝔠𝔒 𝔄𝔩𝔭𝔦𝔫𝔒

.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ℕ𝕖𝕨 β„€π•–π•’π•π•’π•Ÿπ•• β„π•’π•Ÿπ•œπ•€ π•Šπ•–π•”π• π•Ÿπ•• 𝔽𝕣𝕖𝕖𝕀π•₯, 𝕆𝕦π•₯π•€π•™π•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•€ 𝕄𝕠𝕀π•₯ π•Žπ•–π•€π•₯π•–π•£π•Ÿ π”»π•–π•žπ• π•”π•£π•’π•”π•šπ•–π•€

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕕𝕖𝕒π•₯𝕙 𝕠𝕗 𝕄𝔸𝔾𝔸: π”Έπ•Ÿ π•šπ••π•–π• π•π• π•˜π•šπ•”π•’π• ℂ𝕠𝕝𝕝𝕒𝕑𝕀𝕖

π•‹π•£π•¦π•žπ•‘'𝕀 "π”Όπ•©π•”π•–π•π•π•–π•Ÿπ•₯ ℍ𝕖𝕒𝕝π•₯𝕙" β„‚π•π•’π•šπ•ž π•Œπ•Ÿπ••π•–π•£π•žπ•šπ•Ÿπ•–π•• 𝕓π•ͺ π•„π•–π••π•šπ•”π•’π•₯π•šπ• π•Ÿπ•€ π•’π•Ÿπ•• π”»π•–π•žπ•–π•Ÿπ•₯π•šπ•’ β„‚π• π•Ÿπ•”π•–π•£π•Ÿπ•€